• Users Online: 228
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 

 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 52  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 50-56

Shaped graft for aneurysmal bone cyst of upper-limb bones


Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mansoura University Hospital, Mansoura, Egypt

Date of Submission14-Mar-2014
Date of Acceptance18-Apr-2014
Date of Web Publication6-Nov-2017

Correspondence Address:
Mohamed F Mostafa
36 Al-Gomhoria Street, PO Box 35516, Mansoura
Egypt
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/eoj.eoj_16_17

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Background and purpose The optimal treatment of aneurysmal bone cyst (ABC) remains challenging. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of using bone grafts shaped to the defects caused by ABCs of upper-limb bones.
Patients and methods Totally, 15 patients (12 male and three female) with an average age of 12 years (range: 6–16 years) were treated for ABCs of upper-limb bones by intralesional resection, argon beam coagulation, and shaped bone graft. The grafts were harvested from 14 patients (11 fibulas and three iliac bones) and from the mother of one patient (proximal fibula). Osteosynthesis was required to stabilize the graft in four cases. The modified Enneking’s scoring system was used for functional evaluation.
Results One patient developed partial recurrence at 6 months and required reoperation. Superficial wound infection was encountered in one patient. Shortening of the humeral segment was seen in two patients (1 and 1.5 cm) but without angular deformity. After a mean follow-up of 45 months (range: 24–68 months), the mean functional score was 97.3%.
Conclusion This technique is reliable to obtain a well-reconstructed and growing bone with no or minimal deformity and good function.

Keywords: aneurysmal, bone cyst, shaped graft


How to cite this article:
Mostafa MF, Abed YY, Fawzy SI. Shaped graft for aneurysmal bone cyst of upper-limb bones. Egypt Orthop J 2017;52:50-6

How to cite this URL:
Mostafa MF, Abed YY, Fawzy SI. Shaped graft for aneurysmal bone cyst of upper-limb bones. Egypt Orthop J [serial online] 2017 [cited 2017 Nov 18];52:50-6. Available from: http://www.eoj.eg.net/text.asp?2017/52/1/50/217670


  Introduction Top


Aneurysmal bone cyst (ABC) is an uncommon benign tumor-like lesion of unknown origin that may present a diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma [1]. There is controversy as to whether it is a distinct radiological and pathological entity or a pathophysiological change superimposed on a pre-existing lesion [2]. The original suggestion by Lichtenstein [3] favoring a local circulatory disturbance leading to the blow-out expansion of the bone is still popular. This suggestion is further emphasized by Mirra [4] who noted that the lesion is probably a periosteal to intraosseous arteriovenous malformation. The identification of a consistent t(16;17) chromosomal translocation in primary cases suggests a de-novo tumor [5].

Lack of understanding about its origin and growth makes treatment empirical. The most common treatment has been intralesional excision and bone grafting with a substantial rate of recurrence ranging from 10 to 44% [6],[7],[8]. Abrasions of all surfaces using a high-speed burr and local adjuvant such as phenol, liquid nitrogen, or polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) have been tried to lower the rate of recurrence. However, the use of these adjuvants is much controversial because firm evidence that they are effective is lacking and their use entails considerable risk. Argon beam coagulation has been used as an adjuvant, avoiding complications of other adjuvants [9],[10],[11].

The commonly used filling materials such as autogenous cancellous or corticocancellous bone graft, allogenic freeze-dried cancellous and cortical bone graft, PMMA, and bone substitutes usually take the shape of the lesion, resulting in a deformed bone with the possible limitation of function especially in the upper limb [12],[13],[14]. The current study was conducted to evaluate the results of using bone grafts shaped to the original bone after extended curettage and argon beam coagulation of ABC in upper-limb bones.


  Patients‎ and methods Top


Between May 2005 and September 2011, 15 patients (12 male and three female) with ABCs of the upper-limb bones were treated at Orthopaedic Oncology Unit, Mansoura University Hospital, Egypt. The mean age at the time of surgery was 12 years (range: 6–16 years). The study was approved by the ethics research committee of Mansoura University Hospital in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki. All patients were briefed comprehensively regarding the risks and benefits of the procedure and an informed consent was obtained for inclusion in the study. The diagnosis was made on radiological and histological examination. Plain radiographs were performed for all cases to reveal the expanded multilocular lytic lesions. Computed tomography scan was done in 10 cases to evaluate the lesion for subtle cortical destruction or fracture. In addition, MRI was performed in eight cases to identify the characteristic double-density fluid levels and septations, as well as the extension to the epiphysis. Tissue for histological examination was obtained by trephine biopsy. Two patients with recurrent lesions were biopsied preoperatively to confirm diagnosis. The presence of blood-filled cystic spaces separated by fibrous septa (membranes) of mononuclear stromal cells containing scattered multinucleated giant cells and less commonly reactive bone was suggestive of diagnosis. Only patients with the diagnosis of primary ABC and absence of a pre-existing lesion were included.

The lesion was located in the proximal humerus in eight patients, distal humerus in three patients, shaft humerus in two patients, and distal radius in two patients. The approximate volume of the cyst was calculated using plain radiograph and more accurately computed tomography scan by multiplying the maximum length and breadth in anteroposterior projection and the depth in lateral projection. Staging was accomplished using the criteria defined by Enneking [15]. Operative treatment consisted of a wide window, extended curettage, argon beam coagulation, and graft insertion. Curved small curettes were helpful to reach small pockets and slits, especially near the diaphyseal side. Care was taken while curetting the lesion close to the physis. A power burr was used to extend the margin of excision and to open the medulla in some cases but was avoided at the broached areas of physis. Argon beam coagulator (Birtcher 6000 Electrosurgical Generator+Argon Beam Coagulator; ConMed Electrosurgery; Irvine, California, USA) was used like a paint brush throughout the entire inner wall and at a minimum near the physis. This produced a thin layer of eschar because of deposition of black carbonized debris ([Figure 1]). Simultaneous irrigation and suction was helpful to clear debris and eschar, preventing contamination and allowing for improved visualization. The sequence of curettage, argon beam coagulation, and lavage was repeated three to four times before application of the graft.
Figure 1 An intraoperative photograph showing the argon beam coagulator wand used as a paint brush with eschar formation throughout the entire inner wall.

Click here to view


After carefully measuring the defect preoperatively and intraoperatively, the graft was harvested from the patient (proximal fibula=9, shaft fibula=2, iliac bone=3) and from the patient’s mother (proximal fibula=1). Proximal fibular grafts taken from the patients provided a smooth cancellous surface for the exposed areas of proximal humeral physis ([Figure 2]). The proximal fibular graft harvested from the mother of a 6-year-old girl (case 1) was cleaned with soft tissue, washed thoroughly with saline, and reshaped before placement in the defect caused by ABC of the distal third radius. In this case, the proximal smooth cancellous surface was applied against the growth plate, and the distal cortical part was internally fixed to the radius with plate and screws ([Figure 3]). The fibular shaft graft was inserted retrograde into the proximal humerus and then impacted back into the distal part in cases with diaphyseal lesion ([Figure 4]). A composite of synthetic bone substitute (ceraform, calcium phosphate hydroxyapatite 65%, and tricalcium phosphate 35%; Teknimed SA, Zone Industrielle de la Herray, Vic en Bigorre, France) and bone marrow aspirate was used to fill the remaining gaps around the graft. The distal humeral lesions were eccentric involving medial condyle in two patients and lateral condyle in one patient. These patients were older enough to obtain autogenous bone graft from their iliac bone. The graft was shaped and placed with the thick portion of the iliac crest at the periphery representing the medial or lateral column and the thin portion centrally toward the thin area of distal humerus where olecranon and coronoid fossae meet ([Figure 5]). The expanded outer shell was collapsed manually and gently over the graft. Osteosynthesis was required to stabilize the graft in place in four cases.
Figure 2 (a–c) Diagrams showing the selected part of the proximal fibula placed after extended curettage of a proximal humeral lesion, the expanded outer cortex was gently collapsed and composite bone substitute was used to fill the gaps. (d) The proximal fibular graft provides a smooth cancellous surface. (e) After placement of the graft with the cancellous surface opposite the broached area of the physis.

Click here to view
Figure 3 (a) Anteroposterior radiograph of a 6 – year – old girl with ABC destructing the distal one third of left radius (Case 1). (b) Proximal fibular graft was harvested from her mother, shaped and stabilized with plate and screws. (c) Follow-up radiograph showing continued growth of the graft and maintained open physis. (d) 5 years after surgery with continuing growth and no deformity.

Click here to view
Figure 4 Photograph showing fibular shaft graft placed intramedullary in humeral diaphyseal lesion.

Click here to view
Figure 5 (a–c) Diagrams of an eccentric distal humeral ABC, the planned area of iliac bone graft and placement of the graft with the thick portion (x–y) laterally and the thin apex (z) centrally towards the area where coronoid and olecranon fossae met. (d) An intraoperative photograph showing the iliac bone graft shaped to the defect in the medial humeral condyle (Case 4). (e) The graft in place.

Click here to view


Patients with humeral lesions were instructed to keep the limb in the arm sling until suture removal and then started early passive range of motion of shoulder, elbow, and wrist. Isometric strengthening exercises and active range of motion were postponed until complete healing of the lesion. For cases with distal radial lesions, a below-elbow plaster cast was applied for 5–6 weeks. All patients were allowed to start finger movement early after surgery guided by pain. The mean duration of follow-up was 45 months (range: 24–68 months). Patients were evaluated radiologically by plain radiographs every 4–6 weeks for progression of healing, local recurrence, and deformity resulting from partial fusion of the epiphysis. After radiographic healing, patients were assessed clinically every 3 months for the first year and every 6 months during the second year and then yearly thereafter. Clinical assessment was done for pain, deformity, limitation of joint movement, and complications at the donor site. The modified Enneking scoring system [16] was used for functional evaluation at the time of final follow-up ([Table 1]). Statistical analysis was performed using the statistical package for the social sciences for Windows (version 17.0, SPSS; SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA). Pearson’s χ2-test, independent-samples t-test, and one-way analysis of variance test were used to define relations among clinical, radiological, and final results. Statistical significance was set at P less than 0.05.
Table 1 Details and results in 15 patients with aneurysmal bone cysts of upper-limb bones

Click here to view



  Results Top


The main presenting symptoms were pain and discomfort associated with swelling in 11 patients. The remaining four patients had repeated pathological fractures of stage 3 proximal humeral lesions. One of them had significant varus deformity with limitation of abduction and was corrected at the time of surgery. There were eight stage 2 lesions and seven stage 3 lesions with a mean size of 78 cm3 (range: 30–240 cm3).

All lesions healed uneventfully after a mean time of 17 weeks (range: 12–22 weeks). Only one patient (case 5) developed partial recurrence at 6 months that required reoperation. The collapsed outer shell disappeared with the progress of healing. The rapid healing of the lesion was significantly related to the young age of patients (P=0.02), the small size (P=0.01), and the less aggressive (stage 2) lesions (P=0.004). Most of the patients (83.3%) with open physis and juxtaphyseal lesions had continued growth in length and width, as evidenced by the absence of deformity or shortening and maintained open physis. Only two (16.7%) patients developed shortening of the humeral segment (1 and 1.5 cm) because of premature fusion of the proximal humeral epiphysis but without angular deformity. These two patients had large-size lesions (mean: 195 cm3) of the proximal humerus with marked broaching of the physis.

There were no cases of deep infection, nerve deficit, or pathological fracture. Superficial infection of the operative wound was seen in one patient and was controlled with repeated dressing and systemic antibiotics. The mean functional score (rating percentage of normal) at treatment completion was 97.3% (range: 87–100%). There were no complications related to the donor site. Subperiosteal harvesting of the fibular graft allowed regeneration of a new fibula. Postoperative pain, abductor dysfunction, and limping after harvesting iliac bone graft could be avoided by proper soft tissue repair.


  Discussion Top


ABC is one of the aggressive benign bone tumors. Despite being described for more than 60 years ago, there is controversy about its nature, pathophysiology, and optimal treatment. Appropriate treatment can be made only after the exclusion of an underlying lesion, particularly giant cell tumor [17]. The use of physical adjuvants such as phenol, liquid nitrogen, and PMMA has been advocated to extend the surgical margin. These adjuvants produce chemical or thermal necrosis and microvascular damage to the walls of the physically excised cyst aiming to decrease the chance of recurrence. However, phenol and liquid nitrogen could penetrate tissues making the neurovascular structures at high risk. In addition, liquid nitrogen can make the bone more brittle and increase the risk of fracture [6].

Lower recurrence rates can also be achieved by marginal or wide resection, but this entails loss of the supporting function of bone and the need for reconstructive surgery [18],[19]. Furthermore, others do not believe it is necessary to perform wide excision to eradicate the disease [20],[21]. In the current study, the cyst walls were not excised, instead allowed to collapse over the implanted graft to provide the new periosteum for growth in width. Local recurrence was seen only in one (7%) patient and was partial at the periphery of a large stage 3 proximal humeral lesion. In agreement with Gitelis and McDonald [22], local recurrence depends mainly on the adequacy of the tumor removal rather than the type of adjuvant used. This is achieved by making a large window to expose the whole cavity, using different sizes curettes, good visualization of the inner walls with the help of a small light source fixed to the suction nozzle, and the use of power burr. The use of a high-speed burr has been suggested to reduce the rate of recurrence [23]. However, Lin et al. [21] detected no difference in recurrence rate with or without the use of high-speed burr. On the other hand, high-speed burr could not be used at the open physis, as this could destroy the growing cells and cause cessation of growth. It is believed that meticulous curettage with small curettes is preferred for the physeal borders.

Argon beam coagulator is a monopolar coagulator that utilizes a beam of argon gas to deliver a radiofrequency electric current to the tissues. The jet of gas blows blood and debris away and allows the inner surface of the cavity to be covered with a thin layer of eschar causing coagulation of blood in the lumen of small vessels and capillaries. The electrical current flows through the gas in arcs that are distributed uniformly across the tissue in depth and area, with tissue effects depending on the power setting and duration of application. The temperature of the tissue reaches a maximum of 205°C when the spray passes over the tissues. The residual tumor cells in the cavity are destroyed by this thermal effect. Compared with other adjuvant treatments, the limited beam length and area and the directional nature of the beam make this technique simple to use, precise, and safe if the nearby neurovascular bundles are protected [10]. Cummings et al. [9] in a preliminary study found that argon beam coagulation after curettage provided improved local control of ABCs compared with curettage without adjuvant or with phenol and not associated with an increase in the operative complications. In the current study, argon beam coagulation was used as an adjuvant in all cases, and there were no difficulties with its use or postoperative complications related to it.

It is noted that the final shape of the new bone will correspond to the one developed by the cyst at the time of surgery. Stuffing the expanded lesion with the commonly used filling materials such as autogenous cancellous or corticocancellous bone grafts, allogenic cancellous or cortical bone graft, or bone substitutes including PMMA usually result in a bulky and deformed bone with possible premature fusion of the nearby epiphysis and shortening [24]. In the present cases, bone graft was intraoperatively shaped with the smooth cancellous surface placed opposite the exposed area of the physis allowing a regular enchondral ossification. This was evidenced by the maintained open physis, continued growth in length, and absence of deformity. Furthermore, the expanded outer cortex was collapsed, gently providing the graft its new periosteum for increase in width.

Autogenous bone graft remains the gold standard as a filler for cavity defects. It demonstrates a high degree of osteoinduction from surface osteoblasts in the host bone, circulating osteoprogenitor cells, and donor cells that survive transplantation. In addition, fresh transplanted autogenous bone exhibits no immune response and undergoes rapid revascularization. However, autogenous bone graft is sometimes not available in sufficient quantity and its harvest has the potential complications of pain, blood loss, increased operative time, infection, and donor site instability [25]. No perioperative or postoperative complications were encountered with harvesting bone graft in the current study. The morbidity could be avoided or minimized if the graft harvesting technique is properly planned and performed. The main weakness of this study was the limited sample size. Despite this recurrence rate, complications and functional results at the final follow-up were comparable to that of other studies using different methods of treatment and adjuvants ([Table 2]).
Table 2 Reported studies using different adjuvant agents compared with the current study

Click here to view


ABC remains an enigma not only regarding origin but also diagnosis and optimal treatment. The use of a shaped strut bone graft after meticulous curettage and argon beam coagulation is a reliable technique to obtain a well-reconstructed and growing bone with minimal or no deformity and good function for ABCs of the upper-limb bones. It is not necessary to perform wide excision to eradicate the disease. Great care should be exercised while removing the tumor near the physeal cartilage to avoid injury to the growing cells and premature epiphyseal fusion. Considering the limited quantity and the morbidities of harvesting autogenous bone graft, the author is looking forward for a shaped bone substitute that can be mixed with bone marrow as a source of osteogenic cells to aid in healing of such lesions[26],[27],[28].


  Conclusion Top


This technique is reliable to obtain a well-reconstructed and growing bone with no or minimal deformity and good function.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Schreuder HW, Veth RP, Pruszczynski M, Lemmens JA, Koops H, Molenaor WM. Aneurysmal bone cysts treated by curettage, cryotherapy and bone grafting. J Bone Joint Surg 1997; 79-B:20–25.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Kransdorf MJ, Sweet DE. Aneurysmal bone cyst: concept, controversy, clinical presentation and imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 164:573–580.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.
Lichtenstein L. Aneurysmal bone cyst: observation on fifty cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1957; 39:873–882.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.
Mirra JM. Aneurysmal bone cyst. In: Mirra JM, Picci P, Gold RH, editors. Bone tumors: clinical, radiologic and pathologic correlations. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lea and Febiger 1989. pp. 1267–1311.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Oliveira AM, Perez-Atayde AR, Inwards CY, Medeiros F, Derr V, His BL et al. USP6 and CDH11 oncogenes identify the neoplastic cell in primary aneurysmal bone cysts. Am J Pathol 2004; 165:1773–1780.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Marcove RC, Sheth DS, Takemoto S, Healey JH. The treatment of aneurysmal bone cyst. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995; 311:157–163.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Mankin HJ, Hornicek FJ, Ortiz-Cruz E, Villafuerte J, Gebhardt MC. Aneurysmal bone cyst: a review of 150 patients. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:6756–6762.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.
Cottolorda J, Bourelle S. Modern concepts of primary aneurysmal bone cyst. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2007; 127:105–114.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Cummings JE, Smith RA, Heck RK Jr. Argon beam coagulation as adjuvant treatment after curettage of aneurysmal bone cysts. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468:231–237.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10.
Lewis VO, Wei A, Mendoza T, Primus F, Peabody T, Simon MA. Argon beam coagulation as an adjuvant for local control of giant cell tumor. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 454:192–197.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]    
11.
Takeda N, Kobayashi T, Tandai S, Matsuno T, Shirado O, Watanabe T, Minami A. Treatment of giant cell tumors in the sacrum and spine with curettage and argon beam coagulator. J Orthop Sci 2009; 14:210–214.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Ozaki T, Hillmann A, Lindner N, Winkelmann W. Aneurysmal bone cysts in children. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 1996; 122:767–769.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Malawer MM, Dunham W. Crysurgery and acrylic cementation as surgical adjuvants in the treatment of aggressive (benign) bone tumors: analysis of 25 patients below the age of 21. Clin Orthop 1991; 262:42–57.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Schindler OS, Cannon SR, Briggs TWR, Blunn GW. Composite ceramic bone graft substitute in the treatment of locally aggressive benign bone tumors. J Orthop Surg 2008; 16:66–74.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Enneking WF. A system of staging musculoskeletal neoplasms. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986; 204:9–24.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Enneking WF, Dunham W, Gebhardt MC, Malawer M, Pritchard DJ. A system for the functional evaluation of reconstructive procedures after surgical treatment of tumors of the musculoskeletal system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993; 286:241–246.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Martinez V, Sissons HA. Aneurysmal bone cyst: a review of 123 cases including primary lesions and those secondary to other bone pathology. Cancer 1988; 61:2229–2304.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Campanacci M, Capanna R, Picci P. Unicameral and aneurysmal bone cysts. Clin Orthop 1986; 204:25–36.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Cole WG. Treatment of aneurysmal bone cysts in childhood. J Pediatr Orthop 1986; 6:326–329.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Cottalorda J, Kohler R, Chotel F, de Gauzy JS, Lefort G, Louahera D et al. Recurrence of aneurysmal bone cysts in young children: a multicenter study. J Pediatr Orthop B 2005; 14:212–218.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Lin PP, Brown C, Raymond AK, Deavers MT, Yasko AW. Aneurysmal bone cysts recur at juxtaphyseal locations in skeletally immature patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008; 466:722–728.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Gitelis S, McDonald DJ. Curettage. In: Simon MA, Springfield D editors. Surgery for bone and soft tissue tumors. East Washington Square: Lippincott-Raven; 1998. pp. 133–157.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Gibbs CP Jr, Hefele MC, Peabody TD, Montag AG, Aithal V, Simon MA. Aneurysmal bone cyst of the extremities: factors related to local recurrence after curettage with a high-speed burr. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999; 81:1671–1678.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Delloye C, De Nayer P, Molghem J, Noel H. Induced healing of aneurysmal bone cysts by demineralized bone particles. A report of two cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1996; 116:141–145.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Perry CR. Bone repair techniques, bone graft and bone graft substitutes. Clin Orthop 1999; 360:71–86.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Dormans JP, Hanna BG, Johnston DR, Khurana JS. Surgical treatment and recurrence rate of aneurysmal bone cysts in children. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986; 204:9–24.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Basarir K, Piskin A, Guclu B, Yildiz Y, Saglik Y. Aneurysmal bone cyst recurrence in children: a review of 56 patients. J Pediatr Orthop 2007; 27:938–943.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Peeters SP, van der Geest IC, de Rooy JW, Veth RP, Schreuder HW. Aneurysmal bone cyst: the role of cryosurgery as local adjuvant treatment. J Surg Oncol 2009; 100:719–724.  Back to cited text no. 28
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Patients‎ ...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Introduction
Patients‎ ...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Introduction
Patients‎ ...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Introduction
Patients‎ ...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Introduction
Patients‎ ...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed8    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded7    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]