• Users Online: 563
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 

 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 48  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 122-125

Anchor suture fixation for displaced tibial spine fractures


Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt

Date of Submission04-Dec-2010
Date of Acceptance06-Jun-2011
Date of Web Publication19-Jul-2014

Correspondence Address:
Hatem S.A. Elgohary
MD, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mansoura University, Mansoura
Egypt
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.7123/01.EOJ.0000428842.13357.8a

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Background

Treatment of displaced tibial spine fractures includes varied modalities. The goal of this study was to assess the results of fixation of tibial spine fractures using anchor passing nonabsorbable braided sutures through the substance of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Patients and methods

Thirteen patients with displaced fractures of the anterior tibial spine were treated in Mansoura emergency hospital with nonabsorbable suture fixation from January 2008 to October 2009; 11 patients were men and two were women. Ten cases were type III and three were type IV following Meyers and McKeever’s classification; the evaluation was performed using the Lachman test and anterior drawer test. The Lysholm score was used as a functional evaluation score.

Results

Lachman and anterior drawer tests were negative in 10 cases and the other three cases had mild positive tests. The mean postoperative Lysholm score was 96, ranging from 88 to 100.

Conclusion

Anchor with suture fixation for displaced tibial spine fracture is a reliable technique with excellent functional outcomes that does not need a further operation for implant removal and with less potential breakage of the bone fragment than with the use of screws. Also, the use of screws can be avoided as they have a tendency to migrate into the bone substance.

Keywords: anchor suture, anterior cruciate ligament, tibial spine


How to cite this article:
Elgohary HS, Selim NM. Anchor suture fixation for displaced tibial spine fractures. Egypt Orthop J 2013;48:122-5

How to cite this URL:
Elgohary HS, Selim NM. Anchor suture fixation for displaced tibial spine fractures. Egypt Orthop J [serial online] 2013 [cited 2020 Aug 5];48:122-5. Available from: http://www.eoj.eg.net/text.asp?2013/48/2/122/137083


  Introduction Top


Avulsion fractures of the tibial spine account for only 1–5% of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries in adults 1. Meyers and McKeever 2 developed a system for the classification of these fractures. In type I fractures, the fragment is minimally displaced, type II fractures show elevation of the anterior half of the fragment, and type III fractures show complete displacement.

This system was modified by Zaricznyj 3, who considered comminution of a displaced avulsion fracture as a type IV fracture. Surgical intervention is indicated for types II, III, and IV because displaced fractures may cause nonunion or malunion as well as loss of knee extension or instability 3–6.

The use of K-wires or screw fixation needs further operation for implant removal in addition to the problems of displaced implants and lack of rigid fixation; also, the use of screws may lead to an increase in fragment comminution. Hence in this study, open surgery and anchor suture fixation of the fractures were used to avoid these problems 7,8.

Sixteen patients with displaced fractures of the anterior tibial spine were treated by open reduction and internal fixation using an anchor fixed to nonabsorbable sutures; of these, only 13 patients completed their follow-up and were included in this study. The results of surgery were assessed clinically and radiologically. The functional outcome was evaluated using the Lysholm knee scoring system 9.


  Patients and methods Top


In this study, 13 patients (11 men and two women) with displaced fractures of the anterior tibial spine were treated in Mansoura emergency hospital by open reduction and internal fixation using an anchor fixed to nonabsorbable sutures in the period between January 2008 and October 2009 [Figure 1].
Figure 1. A 20-year-old male patient with a displaced tibial spine fracture. (a) Preoperative anteroposterior view, (b) preoperative lateral view, (c) immediate postoperative anteroposterior view after fixation with anchor suture, (d) immediate postoperative lateral view after fixation with anchor suture, (e) anteroposterior view 15 months after fixation with anchor suture, tibial spine united, (f) lateral view 15 months after fixation with anchor suture, tibial spine united.

Click here to view


The average age of the patients was 24 years (range, 19–42 years). The injury was because of road traffic accidents in six patients and sports injury in seven. Patients with associated major proximal tibial fractures and children were excluded from the study. All cases were fixed within 4 days of trauma. Fastin metal self-drilling and self-tapping screwing 5 mm anchors were used.

Indication for surgery in these cases was type III and type IV fractures according to Meyers and McKeever’s classification 2.

With the patient lying supine, a tourniquet was inflated after elevation of the lower limb for 5 min. Then, through a medial parapatellar approach with a midline skin incision, the fracture site was reached and the bed was prepared. Then, the anchor was inserted deep into the bone of the bed, the sutures were tied through holes drilled into the fractured tibial spine, and passed through the ACL. A knot was then tied; a second anchor was needed in two cases as one anchor was not sufficient to provide the required stability. After wound closure, a long leg cast was applied until radiological union was achieved. Patients were allowed to partially bear weight until evidence of radiological union; then, full weight bearing was allowed.

The patients were followed up every 2 weeks until union, and then monthly until the last follow-up. The average period of follow-up was 22 months (13–32 months).

Anterior laxity in the knee joint was checked using Lachman’s and anterior drawer tests; when compared with the opposite normal knee, knee function was assessed using the Lysholm knee scoring scale, with a maximum score of 100. Its main parameters are limping (5 points), support (5 points), locking (15 points), instability (25 points), pain (25points), swelling (10 points), stair climbing (10 points), and squatting (5 points), and the results were graded as excellent (91–100), good (82–90), fair (60–81), and poor (<60) 9. A goniometer was used to record the range of motion (ROM) of the knee joint.

Preoperative and postoperative anteroposterior and lateral views were obtained for all patients and the radiographs were assessed for union of fracture and fragment displacement of the tibial eminence.


  Results Top


Thirteen patients with displaced tibial spine fractures were treated at Mansoura emergency hospital from January 2008 to October 2009; 11 patients were men and two were women. Ten cases were type III fractures and three were type IV fractures following Meyers and McKeever’s classification 2.

The average age of the patients was 24 years (range, 19–42 years). Patients were followed up for an average period of 17 months. Mechanisms of trauma were road traffic accidents in six patients and sports injury in seven.

All cases were fixed within 4 days of trauma. Anchor sutures were used to fix the anterior tibial spine fracture, mainly the medial eminence, which is more commonly fractured.

In this study, at the last follow-up, patients had a median Lysholm knee score of 96 (range, 88–100).

At the last follow-up, two patients had a sensation of locking and only two had mild knee swelling after prolonged heavy activities.

All patients achieved radiological union in an average of 7 weeks. No patients developed displacement of the fracture. No significant difference in the ROM was found on comparing the affected and nonaffected knees.

Ten of these patients had extension lag less than 5° at the last follow-up. Three patients had mild degrees of positive anterior Drawer and Lachman tests.


  Discussion Top


The avulsion fracture of the anterior tibial spine can easily be missed if not suspected. This injury is difficult to observed in the anteroposterior view, but can be observed more easily in the lateral view. The possibility of a fractured tibial spine should therefore be considered in all traumatized acutely swollen knees 10.

Various treatment options have been used for displaced anterior tibial spine fractures including conservative management, open or arthroscopic reduction, and internal fixation 1,11–14. In this series, 13 displaced type III and type IV fractures were treated with open reduction and internal fixation using an anchor fixed to nonabsorbable sutures; all our patients were immobilized in a cylinder plaster cast at 0–10° of flexion until radiological union.

Five patients had pain on severe exertion, whereas the rest of the patients had no pain. No patient experienced giving way of the knee; two patients had a sensation of locking of the knee.

Although the treatment of nondisplaced tibial spine fractures is straightforward, displaced fractures may be complicated by nonunion loss of knee extension and/or instability 2, 8, 15–18.

In the displaced avulsions of the tibial spine, internal fixation is the treatment of choice; slight to moderate anterior instability of little functional importance may develop despite anatomical reduction, which may be attributed to ligamentous elongation at the time of the accident 19.

In case the fracture fragment is comminuted or small, sutures inserted through the substance of the ACL enable secure fixation and provide even reduction without requiring a second operation for implant removal and with less potential breakage of the bone fragment than with the use of screws 20,21.

Sharma et al. 10 carried out an analysis of different types of surgical fixation for displaced anterior tibial spine avulsion fractures with absorbable and nonabsorbable materials. They found that adults fixed with nonabsorbable material showed significantly better results than those fixed with absorbable material and that Herbert screws had a tendency to migrate into the bone substance, and are best avoided.

Vega et al. 22 carried out a study on arthroscopic fixation of displaced tibial eminence fractures using an anchor passing no absorbable braided sutures through the substance of the ACL, holding the avulsed bone fragment by tying a locking knot. They found that the anterior drawer and Lachman tests were negative. The mean Lysholm score was 94.

Fixation using anchors does not require drilling through the growth plate as it is the case in fixation with pullout sutures, thus sparing the growth plate in children 22.

Mahar et al. 23, in their biomechanical study, found that Ethibond pullout sutures resulted in a deformation and increased fracture separation, with a potential loss in reduction during cyclic, physiologic loads. On using anchors, the suture length is shorter, with less deformation theoretically; however, further comparative biomechanical study is required.

Rademakers et al. 24 carried out a long-term follow-up study of open reduction and internal fixation of tibial spine fractures. At the 1-year follow-up, the fracture had completely healed in all patients. One patient (3%) required revision of the osteosynthesis because of hardware failure and one (3%) developed a deep infection. The median knee ROM after 1 year was 125° (range 110–140°). The Lysholm score showed good to excellent results in 86% of the patients. It was concluded that open reduction and internal fixation of tibial spine fractures increases the possibility of regaining full stability of the knee joint and good long-term results with low infection rates. Knee function is adequately restored in most patients.

May et al. 25 carried out a retrospective study on tibial spine fractures. They studied the outcome of surgically treated patients with tibial spine fractures and found that patients with screw fixation had a higher reoperation rate for removal of symptomatic hardware.

Chen et al. 26 carried out a study on arthroscopic treatment of tibial spine avulsion fractures using no absorbable suture fixation without postoperative immobilization and found that the mean Lysholm score was 98.4 in cases of fresh fracture and 89.8 in cases of old fracture.


  Conclusion Top


The use of an anchor with suture fixation for a displaced tibial spine fracture is a reliable technique with excellent functional outcomes that does not required a further operation for implant removal and with less potential breakage of the bone fragment than with the use of screws. Also, the use of screws can be avoided as they have the tendency to migrate into the bone substance.[26]

 
  References Top

1.Garcia A, Neer CS II.Isolated fractures of the intercondylar eminence of the tibia.Am J Surg1958;95:593–598.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Meyers MH, McKeever FM.Fracture of the intercondylar eminence of the tibia.J Bone Joint Surg Br1970;52:1677–1684.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Zaricznyj B.Avulsion fracture of the tibial eminence: treatment by open reduction and pinning.J Bone Joint Surg Am1977;59:1111–1114.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Panni AS, Milano G, Tartarone M, Fabbriciani C.Arthroscopic treatment of malunited and nonunited avulsion fractures of the anterior tibial spine.Arthroscopy1998;14:233–240.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Sullivan DJ, Dines DM, Hershon SJ, Rose HA.Natural history of a type III fracture of the intercondylar eminence of the tibia in an adult. A case report.Am J Sports Med1989;17:132–133.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Kawate K, Fujisawa Y, Yajima H, Sugimoto K, Habata T, Takakura Y.Seventeen-year follow-up of a reattachment of a nonunited anterior tibial spine avulsion fracture.Arthroscopy2005;21:760.e1–760.e5.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Veselko M, Senekovič V, Tonin M.Simple and safe arthroscopic placement and removal of cannulated screw and washer for fixation of tibial avulsion fracture of the anterior cruciate ligament.Arthroscopy1996;12:259–262.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.McLennan JG.The role of arthroscopic surgery in the treatment of fractures of the intercondylar eminence of the tibia.J Bone Joint Surg Br1982;64:477–480.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Lysholm J, Gillquist J.Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale.Am J Sports Med1982;10:150–154.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Sharma A, Lakshmanan P, Peehal JP, David H.An analysis of different types of surgical fixation for avulsion fractures of the anterior tibial spine.Acta Orthop Belg2008;74:90–97.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Ahn JH, Yoo JC.Clinical outcome of arthroscopic reduction and suture for displaced acute and chronic tibial spine fractures.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc2005;13:116–121.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Bong MR, Romero A, Kubiak E, Iesaka K, Heywood CS, Kummer F, et al..Suture versus screw fixation of displaced tibial eminence fractures: a biomechanical comparison.Arthroscopy2005;21:1172–1176.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Rang M.Children’s Fractures1983.Philadelphia:J.B. Lippincott;282–284.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Willis RB, Blokker C, Stoll TM, Paterson DC, Galpin RD.Long-term follow-up of anterior tibial eminence fractures.J Pediatr Orthop1993;13:361–364.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Keys GW, Walters J.Nonunion of intercondylar eminence fracture of the tibia.J Trauma1988;28:870–871.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Gronkvist H, Hirsch G, Johansson L.Fracture of the anterior tibial spine in children.J Pediatr Orthop1984;4:465–468.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Oostvogel HJ, Klasen HJ, Reddingius RE.Fractures of the intercondylar eminence in children and adults.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg1988;107:242–247.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Smith JB.Knee instability after fractures of the intercondylar eminence of the tibia.J Pediatr Orthop1984;4:462–464.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.Mylle J, Reynders P, Broos P.Transepiphysial fixation of anterior cruciate avulsion in a child. Report of a complication and review of the literature.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg1993;112:101–103.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.Matthews DE, Geissler WB.Arthroscopic suture fixation of displaced tibial eminence fractures.Arthroscopy1994;10:418–423.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.Kogan MG, Marks P, Amendola A.Technique for arthroscopic suture fixation of displaced tibial intercondylar eminence fractures.Arthroscopy1997;13:301–306.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.Vega JR, Irribarra LA, Baar AK, Iñiguez M, Salgado M, Gana N.Arthroscopic fixation of displaced tibial eminence fractures: a new growth plate-sparing method.Arthroscopy2008;24:1239–1243.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.Mahar AT, Duncan D, Oka R, Lowry A, Gillingham B, Chambers H.Biomechanical comparison of four different fixation techniques for pediatric tibial eminence avulsion fractures.J Pediatr Orthop2008;28:159–162.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.Rademakers MV, Kerkhoffs GMMJ, Kager J, Goslings JC, Marti RK, Raaymakers ELFB.Tibial spine fractures: a long-term follow-up study of open reduction and internal fixation.J Orthop Trauma2009;23:203–207.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.May JH, Levy BA, Guse D, Shah J, Stuart MJ, Dahm DL.ACL tibial spine avulsion: mid-term outcomes and rehabilitation.Orthopedics2011;34:89.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.Chen DY, Jiang Q, Li W.Arthroscopic treatment of tibial intercondylar eminence avulsion fractures using no absorbable suture fixation.Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi2006;44:254–257.  Back to cited text no. 26
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Patients and methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Introduction
Patients and methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1554    
    Printed20    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded140    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]